Why allocations drift
Assets grow at different rates, so a portfolio left alone slowly becomes whatever performed best. That is not a neutral outcome: the winner is now the largest position precisely when it is most expensive, and your risk profile has changed without any decision being made.
A 60/40 split between equities and bonds after a strong equity year can drift to 72/28. You now hold materially more risk than you signed up for.
The two common methods
Threshold methods respond to what actually happened rather than to the calendar, and the hybrid version usually strikes the best balance between discipline and trading costs.
- Calendar — rebalance on a fixed schedule, e.g. quarterly or annually
- Threshold — rebalance whenever a holding drifts more than a set percentage from target, e.g. ±5 points
- Hybrid — check on a schedule, act only if a threshold is breached
What it costs
Every rebalance involves spreads, fees and — outside a tax-sheltered account — potentially a taxable gain. Rebalancing too often converts a risk-control tool into a cost centre. Where possible, rebalance with new contributions by directing them to the underweight assets instead of selling anything.
What it is not
Rebalancing is not a return-maximising strategy. In a long trend it will underperform simply holding the winner, and that is the intended behaviour: it is buying insurance against concentration, and insurance has a price.